24 Comments

I wish more Substack writers understood the truth of this statement about people who don't want to do self-promotion: And to them, we would say: that almost assuredly condemns your writing to the bin of great writing never read.

If we didn't promote ourselves, our Substack would be long dead. Listen to the chicken!

Expand full comment

Excellent article.

Expand full comment

As a book editor I appreciated his comment about the need for editing your writing. So very true. Especially today, with the proliferation of self-publishing. I can’t tell you how often aspiring writers publish a book online and then realize later that it’s riddled with typos, terrible syntax, plot-holes, 2-dimensional characters, weak story-arc, you name it. Most newbies nowadays lack the humility and patience (and frankly talent) it takes to write a serious book. I blame social media, the ease of online publishing, and the new culture of telling everyone they’re a writer. (It’s ‘pretentious’ to not affirm one’s innate writing skill, apparently.)

Michael Mohr

‘Sincere American Writing’

https://michaelmohr.substack.com/

Expand full comment

I love the anonymous chicken approach. Great animal to head that type of publication, can’t wait to read.

Expand full comment

In your view, does the term Personal Sovereignty mean a citizen has no obligation to do the work of creating a More Perfect Union? How literally do you take it and do you understand the negative implications of working in an undercurrent to degrade the founding principals of E pluribus Unum?

Expand full comment

Fabulous interview , many thanks

Expand full comment

Thoroughly enjoyed this conversation, particularly as a fellow writer of a financial market newsletter!

Expand full comment

comprehensive, frank and marketwise!

Expand full comment

An obvious knock-off of Michael Bloomberg's news company. How'd U not get sued?

Expand full comment

This is great news!

Expand full comment

Doomberg explained some great principles. I can't wait until the next time you have Doomberg as a guest.

Expand full comment

Not for anything, part of evaluating information read on the Internet is knowing the source. Why should I follow something not know from where it came? It is reminiscent of people following Q.

Expand full comment

I've taken stuff away from this conversation. I guess I'm one of those romantically involved with my writing.

A curious question, since I am an ex finance/ ex treasury professional. Do you think the cycle will reverse? Or will we always be doomed simply because humanity has become less humane with time?

Expand full comment

Learned some great stuff from this interview. Thanks!!

Expand full comment