271 Comments
author

Substack Reads is designed to showcase the remarkable work and fascinatingly varied perspectives that have found a home on the platform. We welcome thoughtful criticism and conversation, but comments that are off-topic, rude, disparaging, or derogatory will be removed. In other words: If you can’t say something kind, at least say something interesting.

Expand full comment

Good piece that I found informative but could have done without your gratuitous slur toward people over a certain age. I doubt that you would make such a remark about people of a gender, or race that differs from yours and I wonder why you think ageism is ok ?

Expand full comment

Hear, hear! The ubiquity of ‘isms just got normalized. Ageism 1, credibility 0.

I can fall asleep to whatever TV program I wish and typically do without brandy. The content of 99% of all network programming is pathetic and banal. If it’s on, I’m asleep or in a coma.

Expand full comment

Getting a little touchy there, Sir.

Expand full comment

This not the first time I've seen a disparaging 'boomer' reference from a writer. Don't throw the boomer out with the bathwater, bro.

Expand full comment

"Pathetic and banal" is why the MSM is defeating itself.

Get over your age grievance and realize what age demographic is still most likely to trust and be influenced by what you rightly called the MSM.

Expand full comment

At my age, I’m unable to get over much *except* grievances. Even some of them are insurmountable. I’m glad you think when all the boomers are gone things will be idyllic. I never used the term MSM, you conflated and interjected that acronym.

Expand full comment

I was about to say that but you did it fare more eloquently than I would have. I'm one of those 78 year olds!

Expand full comment

My sentiments about his slur toward people of over a certain age. For many it is easy to belittle ‘those over a certain age’. Whilst younger generations are too busy with their eyelashes false nails and arses we are reading, joining political groups and being pro-active. I’m a septuagenarian read avidly, walk around 10 miles a day. Travel around in my beaten old camper with my two dogs, see places and people have intelligent conversations.

Expand full comment

That's pretty awesome Cathy. We'll try to keep up as we approach that grand old age.

Expand full comment

And no sense of humor. You must be a riot.

Expand full comment

I'm 80. The best part of the article was,

"..., the worn-sole executive editors of Hearst, or the TV anchors who serve as white noise for septuagenarians to fall asleep to after their 8 p.m. brandy."

Expand full comment

It's ignorance and arrogance.

I don't know anyone who watches news on TV; not for more than a decade. I don't know anyone who has ever sipped brandy in the evening. I don't know anyone who falls asleep in front of the TV at 8pm.

Tina Brown is 70 years old (maybe Hamish doesn't know that), and made the Substack list without yet having a Substack.

Being old means you didn't die young. I always wonder why that's subject to so much derision.

Expand full comment

It's not the average age of viewers that makes network news tedious. It's the worn out formula, simplistic point of view and the non-stop drug ads. Oh My G_D! The drug ads!

Expand full comment

Younger generation should definitely celebrate and take advantage of the enthusiastic and intellectually vital support of half or more of us boomers. When we die off, you'll be forced to contend with our children, the Reagan era babies who are a pretty grasping and materialistic bunch.

Expand full comment

Hahaha....who do you think watches the MSM? It ain't the millennials.

Expand full comment

Snarky Agist remarks are all the rage these days. It's a sign of cultural decline and youthful arrogance...John Lennon did it famously "never trust anyone over 30".

Expand full comment

Right! The millennials are never ignorantly belittled by us older and wiser folks.

Expand full comment

Substack is fine without curated reads.

Expand full comment

Heather Cox Richardson should be on your list.

Expand full comment

Came here to say that. Heather Cox Richardson and Joy Vance.

Expand full comment

Absolutely, don’t know why I didn’t think of Joyce. Kind of annoying that most of the women on this list are fashion/entertainment writers.

Expand full comment

And Robert Reich.

Expand full comment

On top of the list

Expand full comment

Heather Cox Richardson

Expand full comment

Thank you. I was just going to say that. No falling asleep drinking brandy (I’ve never even tasted brandy) reading this ultra intelligent, hard working historian. She makes history relevant. Check out her paid subscriber numbers!

Expand full comment

This is in reference to substack publisher Heather Cox Richardson since replies don’t fall under specified comment.

Expand full comment

The list unfortunately left off one of the most consequential and informative writers today; Racket News, written by Matt Taibbi.

Expand full comment

And Public - Michael Shellenberger. People outside the Overton window are mysteriously missing

Expand full comment

It is The New Yorker so the list purposely excluded anyone without traditional left of center views - Taibbi, Shellenberger, Attkisson, Herridge, and Prasad. The first four are proponents of unbridled free speech but that is a value that The New Yorker no longer espouses.

Expand full comment

I’m sure a lot of these kind of lists are done by subscriber numbers and Matt Taibbi can chalk up 470,000 on Substack.

I bet it’s a petty omission by the paper. Based on their style of journalism, I wouldn’t be surprised.

Expand full comment

Oh good mention!

Expand full comment

Please include Matt Taibbi.

Expand full comment

I would disagree with you in one respect. You've had a steadfast real stance against censorship for Substack that is worth more than entire MSM industry❣️ Thanks.

Expand full comment

Seconded. Free speech is priceless. Thank you to Substack for protecting it and empowering creators. MSM labels any narrative it doesn’t like “misinformation”. They will go the way of Pravda.

Expand full comment

Absolutely Amen to that!

Expand full comment

Where is Tucker, Alex Jones, Katherine Austin Fitz, David Icke, Joe Rogan, many more. This list means nothing

Expand full comment

Hear, Here, so correct. Wish I thought of them in my reply. Greg Hunter too USA Watchdog.com He has incredible guests.

Expand full comment

Tucker is a well paid hack and a complete hypocrite... Talk about snarky; his performance is just nauseating; but he got $20,000,000/yr at Fox and a $1,000,000 Christmas bonus from Harlin Crow, the Nazi billionaire so like George Washington said "human can resist the highest bidder"...

Expand full comment

Joe Rogan is toxic. Sorry to see you mention him.

Expand full comment

Precisely! Authors whose insights provoke turmoil & thought are not on any MSM list. Conversely, the censored doctors that opposed plandemic madness,—Kory, McCullough, Malone, Mercola, ...—were precisely targeted & placed on the White House's "dirty dozen list."

Laugher, at the attempts by FaucistBook, the USG, Pfeizer, et al., to pro• des• pre• sub• -scribe truth in their Empire of Lies, is at times heart's only recourse [recall "safe & effective," "Russia Gate," "6 Jan Insurrection," "Hunter's laptop," etc.]; for mirth lightens the heart as we trundle forward into a darkening Technological Age.

—«I've Got a Little List», The Mikado - Gilbert & Sullivan, is.gd/bWnyQT

Expand full comment

On the way to unemployment checks?

Expand full comment

I would argue that the media moguls did this to themselves, when they started using the News Room as a profit center and then as part of the entertainment lineup.

Expand full comment

Consolidation of traditional 'journalism' under around 4 collaborating corporate umbrellas is a reminder why antitrust laws exist, too.

Ignoring the difference between facts and opinions when reporting is another cause for the profession's reputation decline.

Expand full comment

I am not sure what constitutes “influential” anymore

I’ve never heard of this author and they currently have 132 likes on substack- which is frankly about as many readers as a good reporter would have writing an article for a small market daily newspaper in the heyday of print journalism. Social media floods the opinion market with a lot of who cares pieces about issues the writer is experiencing from the comfort of their second bedroom office conversion or moms basement. Someone trying to get information out from a war zone or a flood ravaged Appalachian hamlet is going up against Zoey and her latest mascara hack, or this guy who thinks humble bragging is adequate fodder for their daily post

Expand full comment

Beat me to it.

Expand full comment

The far left list!

Expand full comment

I don't know if I agree with your particular list or not however look where I am. Right here with you. I agree wholeheartedly that television and paper news can't keep up with online independent journalists, content creators and influencers. You still have to be careful about to trust but everyone I follow shows their work which means they are giving me the context I need and the proof I need what they are saying is true. And I get exactly what I need to know in almost real time, with a follow-up in a day or two that verifies new information or updates.

Expand full comment

Think about using shorter sentences.

Expand full comment

So sorry. Didn't realize I was on X. I'll try harder next time.

Expand full comment

One of the first novels I read was, "Les Miserables." Unfortunately, that novel influenced my writing style for TOO LONG. (Some of his sentences go on for more than one page) Anyway, it took a while, but I am now more interested in conveying a message than in admiring my style. Shorter is better.

Expand full comment

Warren, your hubris is unmatched. Felicitations!

Expand full comment

Your comment is so ridiculous that I suspect that you don't know the meaning of "hubris." My suggestion for you is to stick to words that you are familiar with.

Expand full comment

Definitely hubris. You nailed that.

Expand full comment

lol good comeback

Expand full comment

Thanks for the mention! Had no idea I made this list lol so much for being tapped in...

Expand full comment
Oct 22Liked by Hamish McKenzie

How did you know about my brandy? And, I sip it an hour earlier.

Expand full comment

I’m still going with Scotch.

Expand full comment

You forgot Thom Hartman

Expand full comment

The photographer for a piece in “The New York Magazine” had to be shipped in from The Netherlands? Rich irony there.

Expand full comment

What’s interesting and rather sad is that this question would have never been posed to Murrow or Cronkite. They were journalists with integrity not power. I suppose those with opinions are now the power brokers.

Expand full comment

Agreed. And Cronkite and the others on TV and in daily newspapers had editors! They were fact-checked and knew history, in part because they lived it in the field. I was a reporter for 20 years before going back to school to become a teacher. The publishing and airing of unsubstantiated claims, rumor mongering, and conspiracy theory nonsense that passes for “news” today is a disservice to the public. If I had made these kinds of lazy “mistakes”I would have been fired. But outlandish BS and sensational headlines get clicks, and too often, that’s all that matters now.

Expand full comment

So true. Is that why you left reporting?

Expand full comment

No. My wife and I had young kids. I volunteered in my son’s 2nd grade classroom and found the seven-year-olds much more honest and mature than the Congress critters I was covering at the time, so the decision to switch was pretty easy. Plus, when I left in 2000 it was already becoming apparent that the business model for traditional newspapers and magazines wasn’t going to work in the digital age. Veteran reporters, with relatively high salaries, were the first to get the axe. I saw the handwriting on the wall. Taught for 22 years. Never regretted the decision, though I still enjoy writing, hence my Substack page.

Expand full comment